• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Kim Hermanson PhD

Facilitating Creative Breakthroughs

  • Home
  • Sessions
    • 15 Minute Mini-Session
    • Doorway Sessions
  • Online Course
  • Resources
    • Books
    • Audio Courses
    • Courses to License
  • Media
    • Interviews
    • Articles
    • Blog
    • Youtube
  • About
  • Contact
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Rich, fertile space is more important than content.

February 5, 2009

When I teach, what I think about is how I’m going to create space for learning and magic, not the content. In the larger scheme of things, rich, fertile space is way more important than any piece of information. So if space is so important, why do we continue to focus on the specifics–the subject, the facts, the “thing,” rather than the space?

In his writings, Marshall McLuhan often distinguished between “figure” and “ground”:

“The figure and ground together constitute the totality of what is perceivable. However, it is the figure on which perception is focused. The figure is what appears structured, as the foreground and whereas ground appears as unstructured and background. The boundary between the two appears to belong to the figure, that is why the figure has a shape whereas the ground appears to be shapeless.”

Since our left brains like to name and categorize things, they cause us to focus on the figure and dismiss the background as unimportant. In art, the ground is called “negative space,” and experienced artists know that it’s just as important as the object that is being drawn. In Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain Edwards writes: “…the negative spaces…require the same degree of attention and care that the positive forms require. Beginning students generally lavish all their attention on the objects, persons, or forms in their drawings, and then sort of ‘fill in the background.’ It may seem hard to believe at this moment, but if care and attention are lavished on the negative spaces, the forms will take care of themselves.”

That is certainly true of teaching. Seems like it’s probably true of life as well.
 
 

Previous Post
Next Post

Art, Books, Imaginal, Learning & Creative Process, Teaching, Coaching & Facilitating Betty Edwards, coaching, marshall mcluhan, right brain, third space

Primary Sidebar

Blog Categories

  • Art
  • Books
  • Doorway Sessions
  • Earth/Nature
  • Imaginal
  • Inspiration
  • Learning & Creative Process
  • Metaphor
  • Miscellaneous
  • Social Change
  • Teaching, Coaching & Facilitating

Blog Archives

Blog Tags

aesthetic space albert einstein artist beauty beginner's mind Book Passage carl jung coaching consciousness corita kent courage creative breakthrough creativity deep knowing depth psychology esalen institute form genius george lakoff getting messy goethe heart imagination james hillman john o'donohue key image learning process marshall mcluhan martin foss mihaly csikszentmihalyi play poetry psychology of creativity psychology of metaphor right brain robert henri shamanism singing Sophia Center soul calling stanley kunitz strength thinking third space transformation

Get clarity, see opportunities, and uncover resources that can’t be known any other way.

Copyright © 2023 Kim Hermanson, PhD | Website by Digital PDX